Thursday, March 5, 2009

STOP PANDA EXPRESS

Please be
on SPROUL STEPS
at 7:30pm
THURSDAY March 6, 2009!!!!!!!

We as REACH!, and as UC Berkeley students need to stop panda express from coming onto our campus. We do not need these big corporations and businesses to infect our campus that we hold so dearly. we want a campus that will not buy into the mainstream media and commotions. but for this to happen we need to DEMAND it.

keep fighting. let our voices be heard.

michelle wong


Below is from one of the ASUC Senators, Christina Oatfield, please read and at the very end there are links to learn more:

Hello everyone who has supported the No Panda Express campaign,

*Panda Express Representatives are coming to Berkeley this Thursday!! This
is HUGE! *This is* our opportunity to show them the opposition to Panda
Express at UC Berkeley and drive them away!!* The Store Operations Board has
been voting by a slim majority to continue contract negotiations with Panda,
but *there is still no finalized contract and it is definitely not too late
to stop the plans, especially because Panda has not seen our opposition yet
and if Panda saw how we're able to mobilize against them they might think
twice before spending all that money to come onto our campus.*
They have a private meeting scheduled with members of the SOB and ASUC
elected officials only this Thursday at 8pm in the basement of Sproul Hall,
behind the security of UCPD, but that can't stop us from exercising our
rights to free speech and protesting outside!!

At the last SOB meeting, several dozen students came out and spoke about the
*environmental sustainability, health* and *cultural concerns* they had with
the plans to bring Panda Express into Lower Sproul. *This kind of
mobilization is unprecedented in the history of the Store Operations
Board.*I think the Board was pretty impressed and intimated by our
presence last
time, now let's see if we can scare Panda away from signing the contract.
We need to tell the SOB and Panda Express that we *will not stand for a
large, unhealthy, unsustainable fast food chains that will bring a
commercialized atmosphere to our student union area and misrepresent Chinese
cuisine*. The vacant space in the student union should be used as a student
space, not a commercial space. *We could use it for a student run food
co-op, a bike maintenance shop, space for performing arts, meditation/prayer
space* or other benefits to the local community, rather than a large
nation-wide chain that will suck money out of our local economy.
*Come march in front of the Panda Express meeting in Sproul Hall this
Thursday night at 7:30pm.* Join the Asian-American, Co-op, environmentalist,
progressive, socially conscious and other communities to say no to cultural
imperialism and environmental degradation.

More information about the No Panda Express campaign at UC Berkeley is
below:
*
Daily Cal article about a recent SOB meeting:*
http://www.dailycal.org/article/104095/plans_and_protest_continue_for_panda_express_on_lo

*Opinion piece written by two students*:
http://www.dailycal.org/article/104172/panda_express_lacks_berkeley_s_hallmark_sustainabi

facebook group with *lots of general info* about why you should oppose Panda
Express: http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/group.php?gid=33790440915&ref=ts

link
to *petition *against panda (in case you haven't signed it yet):
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=ksDkJITQycLuKOuei9cIqw_3d_3d

in solidarity with those fighting for environmental and social justice
around the world,

Christina Oatfield
christinaoatfield@gmail.com

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

Recently, Dr. Jim Yong Kim was elected the new president of Dartmouth. Full article about his election here.

However, Dartmouth students wrote a racist email, apparently meant to be a joke, but executed in poor taste. Here is the email.

"Yesterday came the announcement that President of the College James Wright will be replaced by Chinaman Kim Jim Yong. And a little bit of me died inside.

It was a complete supplies.

On July 1, yet another hard-working American's job will be taken by an immigrant willing to work in substandard conditions at near-subsistent wage, saving half his money and sending the rest home to his village in the form of traveler's checks. Unless "Jim Yong Kim" means "I love Freedom" in Chinese, I don't want anything to do with him. Dartmouth is America, not Panda Garden Rice Village Restaurant.

Y'all get ready for an Asianification under the guise of diversity under the actual Malaysian-invasion leadership instituted under the guise of diversity. It's a slippery slope we are on. I for one want Democracy and apple pie, not Charlie Chan and the Curse of the Dragon Queen. I know I sure as shit won't ever be eating my Hop dubs bubs with chopsticks. I like to use my own two American hands."


Then the Dartmouth Pan Asian Council (PAC) issued an apology-

"Hello everyone,

Tonight the PAC interns and Elaine met with Sylvia Spears, Molly Bode, and representatives from the Inter-Community Council, Diversity Peer Advisor interns, and a member of General Good Morning Message (not the writer) to discuss the blitz that was sent out this morning.

As you now know, a blitz intended to be satirical and humorous was executed in poor taste and offended many people in our community, as well as in the entire campus. It has been made clear that no one on any level thinks what happened this morning was in any way acceptable, GGMM writers included. All 7 writers of the GGMM realize the gravity of the statements made in the blitz, regardless of intent, and are taking internal measures towards a resolution. The blitz from this morning will no longer be circulated.

Immediate updates:
- Tomorrow, the author and the members of GGMM will send out a campus-wide blitz apologizing to the Asian & Asian-American community, as well as Dartmouth as a whole, acknowledging not only the lack of oversight on GGMM's part, but also the deeply offensive nature of the blitz's contents.

-The author will be utilizing OPAL's resources to address underlying and perhaps subconscious biases that led to the blitz being composed and sent out.

-Upper level members of the Administration will be meeting tomorrow morning to assess the situation. This issue is being taken very serious. More information to come after President Wright and administrators meet.

In the near future:
-Students will collaborate to organize a reception for President-Elect Kim. We hope to demonstrate to Dr. Kim that all of campus is very excited for his arrival.

-The author will compose a formal apology to President-Elect Kim. [sic]"


More comprehensive cover of this issue here.

What do YOU think? Should satirical comments be taken at face value? Or are there deeper issues that spur these remarks but are not addressed? How do you feel about the writer of the racist email generalizing President-Elect Kim's Korean ethnicity to include Chinese racial slurs? More specifically, notice the remark about "Panda Garden Rice Village Restaurant." Such a generic name is only MORE REASON TO PROTEST AGAINST A PANDA EXPRESS ON CAMPUS that will further misrepresent Chinese cuisine!


P.S. Rally tomorrow against Panda Express coming into Berkeley! 7:30 on the Sproul steps!

Saturday, February 21, 2009

prisons?

What do you all think about the prison system and the prison industrial complex that was part of the discussion during last week's meeting?

please leave opinions.

Friday, February 20, 2009

The Age of Crimmigration is Upon Us: Latinos New Majority-In Federal Prisons

February 19, 2009

A Rising Share:  Hispanics and Federal Crime

A recently released report provides another startling indicator of how Latino demographics are being used to lead the United States into a new age, the Age of Crimmigration. Produced by the Pew Hispanic Center, the report found that Latinos are now the largest single ethnic group in the federal prison system.

Fueled, in large part, by changes to immigration law that have multiplied exponentially the ways in which undocumented immigrants can be prosecuted and jailed as criminals, the new Latino federal prison majority documented in the report provides definitive proof of the “crimmigration” thesis developed by legal scholars like Juliet Stumpf of the Lewis and Clark Law School in Oregon. Stumpf’s groundbreaking paper, “The Crimmigration Crisis: Immigrants, Crime, & Sovereign Power,” predicted how a lethal combination of forces-changes to immigration laws, political shifts, intensified prosecution and enforcement - would lead to what she called, in 2006, “the most important development in immigration law today: the convergence of immigration and criminal law.” On a less legalistic level,the news of the new Latino federal prison majority also means the convergence of hundreds of thousands of the poor white, black and Latino families in terms of their dealings with a prison system fed increasingly with immigrant bodies. Nearly half of all Latino offenders were convicted of immigration-related crimes, crimes that only became crimes as a result of relatively new sentencing laws and policies.

Although normalized over the course of several years by a confluence of separate but symbiotic interests - opportunistic politicians (Republican and Democrat), nationalistic and race-baiting media personalities, multi-billion dollar security and prison-industrial interests, “immigrant rights advocates” (and the major foundations that fund and legitimate them) promoting “smart” & “tough” immigration policies in exchange for legalization for 12 million undocumented-the immigrant=criminal axiom is, in legal terms, a relatively recent historical development. And it will likely worsen without major mobilizations from below.

As the new Latino federal prison majority overtakes the sizeable populations of whites and African Americans in federal facilities, it should be noted that the criminalization of immigrants and immigration policy described by the crimmigration thesis comes as an extension of previous legal and other institutional practices. For example, the exponential increase in laws facilitating the mass incarceration of mostly Latino migrants appears to follow the same pattern and logic that led to the exponential increase in the disproportionate drug sentencing laws and policies that led to the mass incarceration of African and other, mostly poor Americans. Without radical intervention from below or a definitive change of heart from above- or both, immigration laws will join drug laws as the drivers of the prison system in the Obama era.

Latinos already account for 40 percent of those convicted of federal crimes, a percentage that has doubled from 1991 to 2007 (see chart below). And, according to this report in the New York Times, “Of Latino federal offenders, 72 percent are not United States citizens and most were sentenced in courts from one of the four states that border Mexico.” (contd. below chart)

(from NY Times)

nyt-crimmigration-stats

Because crimmigration combines two political third rails -criminal justice and immigrant rights-, legal reform, enforcement and prosecution and detention issues in immigration policy have been and may continue to be largely ignored by elected officials and other policy influentials. That candidate and now President Obama and his allies have remained largely silent on the crisis of incarceration and criminal justice in black and Latino communities does not bode well for the “hope” that the Obama administration will be willing to take on powerful lobbies of the fast growing immigration prison-industrial complex: aerospace, surveillance and prison-building industries like Halliburton and Boeing, prison guard unions (whose fasest-growing group are Latino prison guards), and super predatory private prison management firms like GEO. Soon, we will likely see increasing numbers of immigrants themselves joining the ranks of those profiting from mass imprisonment of immigrants.

But, if there’s an opportunity to be found (and there always is) in the cloudy complexities of crimmigration policy it is the realization that the silver lining is actually and truly black and brown. Growing Latino majorities in the already overcrowded federal penitentiary system are nothing if not an unprecedented opportunity to create a visionary, mass-based movement of blacks and Latinos and others committed to ending the disgrace that makes us the largest carcereal country on earth. Rather than operate piecemeal and in separate silohs, criminal justice and immigrant detention activists can together lead a powerful movement the likes of which this country has never seen. Crimmigration represents as much a historic opportunity as it does a great danger in times of economic and political crisis.

Source: http://ofamerica.wordpress.com/2009/02/19/the-age-of-crimmigration-is-upon-us-latinos-new-majority-in-federal-prisons/

Credits to Of América and Robert Lovato for the article.

--

The convergence of Immigration law with criminal law is not just an issue that affects the Latino/Chicano community. It is an issue that affects all communities of color. We need to be conscious of these changes in the justice system that will potentially give authorities more reason to criminalize our communities.

-PA

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Feb. 10, 2009 3rd REACH! general meeting: Language use around us

Thank you everyone who came to the meeting! It was a packed room full of conversation, which was what we hoped for. Please use this blogspot to express something you may have wanted to say during the meeting but did not get a chance to. You may do that by pressing COMMENT below this post. Share your experiences, opinions, and about things around you relating to how language is used!! This is a safe space!

We posed these questions:

Language in Culture and Society

  1. Does culture have a role on language, or vice versa?
  2. From your own experiences, discuss how different types of labels influence how you think about others or yourself.

Written, Spoken, and Body Language

  1. What does body language convey that spoken language cannot, or vice versa?
  2. How do you perceive a language that does not have a formal writing system?

Language and Rhetoric

  1. How does language play an important role in the media or politics? Examples?

Some ideas that were brought up:

Language in Culture/Society

  1. Colloquial language, or regional slang (e.g. Hyphy movement in Bay Area, the word “hella” in Nor-Cal) become a source of identity that people, especially youth, are able to claim
  2. There is a mis-use of words that has created negative connotations, such as retarded, gay (How have groups of people reclaimed derogatory words?)
  3. In society, there is an affinity toward European accents versus other English accents (like English with a Chinese accent), which shows the power dynamics and status of people/groups
  4. There are major language barriers in American with people who speak different languages, which is a huge issue in the API community. Is that intentional?

Written, Spoken, and Body Language

  1. Body language and spoken language are interconnected, and they complement each other because some feelings or messages conveyed in body language is just as important as what is spoken, and vice versa.
  2. Body language can be misinterpreted just as much as written and spoken language
  3. When a group of people have no formal writing system, and it is imposed upon them, there may be a loss in translation. It is a Euro-centric way of seeing language, as having “uncivilized” qualities if a language does not have both written and spoken language.

Language and Rhetoric (politically and in the media)

  1. Laws and propositions use very selective words to elicit specific emotions to bias one’s opinion. We must be aware of what policy-makers are saying
  2. In the media, especially in television shows, and how hosts speak tells us a lot about the target audience
  3. Even within the ASUC on campus, trying to articulate opinions and getting the acknowledgement of being valid in what is being said is difficult. There is a way of speaking in such positions, as in government or policy making, that is biased to those who are trained to speaking formally, and using the right words.
--
Connie Huang

Thursday, February 5, 2009

Councilman Anglicizes his Vietnamese 1st name

Like other politicians, Truong Diep says change is for ease.

The Orange County Register

WESTMINSTER – Truong Diep, the city's newly elected councilman who won a close race in November, has changed his Vietnamese first name to one he believes is much easier and convenient for city staff and his constituents: Tyler.

Diep made the switch last week, but says he plans to officially change his name in the next couple of months.

Tyler was a name, Diep said, he used briefly as a college intern.

"I worked as a receptionist in a predominantly Caucasian area and no one really got my name," he said. "So I just started to call myself Tyler."

He said he liked the sound of that name because it wasn't too commonplace. But Diep, a public administration major from San Diego State University and a politics junkie, also liked it because it was the last name of a former United States president, John Tyler.

Switching from ethnic to Anglicized first names is hardly uncommon in the political arena. There are many examples in Orange County politics. Andy Quach, Diep's fellow councilman, did the same when he became a naturalized citizen.

"Having a recognizable name just makes things friendlier and more welcoming for everybody," said Quach, whose Vietnamese name is Tuan Ngoc.

The change will hopefully help city staff members and others pronounce and spell his name correctly, Diep said.

Name changing is a trend among younger generations of Asian Americans, not just Vietnamese Americans, said Linda Vo, chair of Asian American Studies at UC Irvine.

"With Vietnamese people in particular, a common reason to change names is because there are so many common first and last names that there is too much confusion and misidentification," she said. "When you pick an Anglo name, it reduces that confusion."

Diep said his parents and friends understand the reason for the change and have accepted it.

"For an immigrant kid who came to this country at the age of 8 with nothing more than the baggage we brought along, this has been an awesome experience," says Diep, one of the youngest city officials in Orange County at the age of 25.

"This is another way of showing my appreciation for this country that has given me so much already."

It is fashionable among politicians to make a switch from a Vietnamese to an "American" name before an election, Vo said. But in Diep's case, it is different because he did it after he won a close election, she said.

"He already had name recognition," Vo said.

Diep's name was never an issue politically, says Assemblyman Van Tran, who is Diep's boss and political mentor.

"He won every election with his Vietnamese name even when he was the underdog," said Tran, who is one of the few Vietnamese American politicians who did not go for the name change.

"He's been doing pretty well as Truong and he'll continue to do well as Tyler."

Contact the writer: 714-445-6685 or dbharath@ocregister.co

-----------------------

What do you all think about Diep changing his name? Do you think he should have done it? How can you relate REACH!'s meeting on "generational gap" to this article? Tell us what you think!


-PA

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Asianweek: Health in the API Community

Among Asian Americans, Many Subgroups Lack Adequate Health Coverage

January 28, 2009


Asian Americans are often seen as the model minority, with higher rates of education, income, and employment. But this perception might be overshadowing the problems of lack of health insurance coverage among the Asian American community.

In a January 2007 study by Kaiser Family Foundation called “Key Facts: Race, Ethnicity, and Medical Care,” Asian Americans, when compared to other minority groups, had relatively high rates of health coverage. Of the white, non-Hispanic population, 13 percent were uninsured, with Asian Americans falling not far behind, with 19 percent uninsured. In contrast, 34 percent of Hispanics, 32 percent of Native Americans and Alaska Natives, and 21 percent of African Americans were uninsured. Comparatively, Asian Americans were the best-performing minority group in terms of health coverage.

But when separated into different ethnicities, the data for health insurance coverage for Asian Americans becomes shocking, with many subgroups having high rates of uninsured people.

“When we aggregate the data and look at it all together, they do perform better than all other ethnic groups, but when we disaggregate them, we find that lumping Asian Americans together really does mask a lot of problems,” said Cara James, senior policy analyst for Kaiser Family Foundation, who led a study released April 2008 that examined health coverage among Asian Pacific Islanders.

The study found large variations among the Asian American population: Employer-sponsored coverage was as high as 77 percent for Asian Indians, but as low as 49 percent for Koreans. In general, Indians and Japanese had the highest rates of coverage, with just 12 percent of their populations uninsured.

Filipinos followed with 14 percent uninsured, Chinese with 16 percent, other South Asians with 20 percent, Vietnamese with 21 percent, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders with 24 percent, and Koreans, with the highest rate of uninsured, at 31 percent.

James attributed the high rate of uninsured among Koreans to their tendency to work in small businesses which can’t afford employee health insurance. “Koreans tend to work for smaller employers, which partly explains higher rates of uninsured, contrasted to the perception that Koreans tend to be not poor, so though they have high incomes, they have lower rates of insurance,” she said.

The Kaiser Family Foundation study found that 60 percent of nonelderly adult Korean workers are employed at companies with 100 employees or less, compared to less than 40 percent for other Asian and Pacific Islander groups.

One of the major issues uncovered by the study was the effect of grouping Pacific Islanders and Native Hawaiians with Asians: the low rates of health coverage among Pacific Islanders are masked by the influence of the larger populations like Chinese and Filipinos.

Deeana Jang, policy director of Asian and Pacific Islander American Health Forum, who helped with the study, said, “We shouldn’t lump all Asian Americans together. The Pacific Islander number is such small number, it’s really meaningless. We need to separate it out.”

James agreed, especially considering the large disparities in coverage between Asians and Pacific Islanders.

“We tend to talk about Asian Americans collectively, but Native Hawaiians have rates compared to some of the worst-performing minority groups,” James said.

James correlated the rates of health coverage to income, saying that Indians had the highest rate of coverage because they are least likely to be poor, meaning their incomes are well above the federal poverty line. Meanwhile, she pointed out that 43 percent of Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders are near poor.

Gem Daus, a Filipino American studies and Asian American sexuality professor at the University of Maryland, who formerly worked with APIAHF, agreed that income is a major factor in getting coverage.

“It’s expensive, and it’s hard to get, especially when you’re not making a lot of money,” he said.

But even beyond issues of low income, are language barriers, which make it difficult for those who don’t speak English well to navigate a health system that is already complicated.

“It’s confusing enough in English,” Daus said.

One unique program in Montgomery County, Maryland is trying to remedy this.

Called the Asian American Health Initiative, the program was established in 2005 to meet the health needs of Asian Americans in the county, which comprise 13.5 percent of the Montgomery County population. The program aims to expand health services available to Asian Americans, outreach to different ethnic groups about the availability of health care, and eliminate barriers for those in the Asian American community to accessing health care. It specifically targets seniors and recent immigrants who are often isolated.

“Asian Americans have the highest linguistic isolation compared to other groups, even Hispanics,” said Julie Bawa, AAHI’s program director.

Often, language barriers can prevent immigrants from seeking health care or understanding how to obtain health insurance. To fix this problem, AAHI has a program called the Patient Navigator Program.

The program identifies health resources for Asian Americans in Montgomery County and helps navigate the health care system for people who otherwise would have been limited by lack of English skills, uninsured or underinsured status, or socioeconomic status. Information specialists speak Hindi, Vietnamese, Chinese, and Korean, languages spoken by 70 percent of the county’s Asian American population. For those who need other languages, language lines are used to translate.

Bawa said that the top question asked is “How do I get insurance?” Questions also range from how to apply for Medicare and Medicaid to simple requests for help filling out forms, showing a gap between the availability of health coverage and general understanding in how to obtain it.

“There needs to be more awareness in general, as well as more effort in having materials in different languages,” Bawa said.

But even beyond language barriers are obstacles for recent immigrants, who must wait five years after arriving in the U.S. to be eligible for public health programs.

“Because Asian Americans are largely an immigrant population, there are still some barriers for immigrants to access public health coverage,” Jang said.

Immigrants also face the problem of conflicting priorities: whether to get health coverage or deal with more immediate needs like finding jobs and providing for the family, said Bawa.

There is also the issue of cultural barriers. Findings from the Commonwealth Fund’s 2001 Health Care Quality Survey found that Asian Americans, as compared to other groups, were “the least likely to feel that their doctor understands their background and values, to have confidence in their doctor, and to be as involved in decision-making as they would like to be.”

Only 56 percent of Asian Americans said they felt involved in decision-making, compared to 78 percent of whites. Only 48 percent reported they felt their doctor understood their background and values, compared to the highest rate of 61 percent for Hispanics.

Jang said she thinks this could be prevented if doctors took the time to find out more about their patients. “In order to have high quality care, you have to be patient-sensitive, you don’t treat patients same. You need to find out about their lives, and ask the right questions,” she said.

Interestingly, the Kaiser Family Foundation study found that Asian Americans who were 3rd plus generation Americans were the most likely to have health insurance, compared to other subgroups, with just 11 percent uninsured.

However, James attributes this not to cultural values, but to the fact that families in the U.S. longer tend to have higher education, income, and jobs, which she says all affect take-up of coverage.

Jang agreed, especially based on her own experience. “My grandma was a garment worker. She didn’t have health coverage. I’m an attorney. So the longer people are here, the next generation gets better jobs that are more likely to provide coverage.”

Still, high un-insurance rates remain a problem, especially in light of Asian Americans’ high susceptibility to cancer and Hepatitis B.

Those without health insurance tend to not seek health care, missing out on preventative screenings for things like cancer. This is especially important because cancer is the leading cause of death for Asian Americans, according to data from 2003 from the National Center of Health Statistics. But for Hispanics, African Americans, and whites, heart disease is the leading cause of death.

Jang said she believes this abnormal trend is due to the fact that Asian Americans are less likely to be screened for cancer, allowing the problem to worsen over time and only be caught later on.

The solution to improving health insurance rates still has yet to be found. Daus believes that universal health care coverage should be expanded, while making sure to outreach to specific communities. Jang believes that more patient navigators should be provided to help Asian Americans who would otherwise be lost trying to understand a complicated system.

But one thing remains clear, despite perceptions of Asian Americans being a model minority, health coverage and access to care are major problems in the community. Access to health insurance needs to be made easier, Daus said.

He said, “Health insurance is a safety net for the future, but if you have more immediate needs and it’s not easy to get, it’s easy to ignore.”